On smaller screens, scroll sideways to compare both tools.

Features and pricing of selected tools
Compare featuresTallyAirtable
Best forAn online form platform; evaluate fair-use conditions, branding, collaboration and retention requirements.A hosted platform for structured data and workflows; assess workspace billing, collaborator roles and capacity.
CategoryAutomation & websitesAutomation & websites
Paid entry priceUS$29 / mo+Billed monthly · Pro

Pro monthly amount from official guidance, distinct from annual equivalents. Fair use applies to free submissions; Business controls have separate terms.

US$24 / mo+Billed monthly · Team

Monthly Team amount per billable collaborator. Role and workspace structure determine the total; introductory Team trial features differ from Free.

Free planSupportedSupported
Japanese supportUnverifiedUnverified
DeploymentCloudCloud
Reasons to choose
  • Evaluate form structure with continuing Free access
  • Published paid tiers distinguish branding and team requirements
  • Organize different working views of structured records
  • Evaluate intake together with the internal register
Before you subscribe
  • Unlimited wording remains subject to fair use
  • Japanese form text does not establish Japanese administrative support
  • Verify which roles are billable on the chosen offer
  • A trial feature is not evidence of a permanent Free entitlement
Pricing checked2026-10-282026-10-28
Official pricingCheck pricingCheck pricing

Prices exclude tax, currency conversion and introductory discounts. Different currencies and billing periods are not directly comparable. Japanese support can apply to input, output or the interface; check each tool’s scope.

In this guide
  1. Separate respondents from editors
  2. Inspect the existing data model
  3. Compare the actual response specification
  4. Price both layers of the process
  5. A hypothetical fifty-request pilot
  6. Prepare to remove either layer
  7. Test a correction after intake

Separate respondents from editors

External submission and an operator’s status update are different actions. Check whether an external person needs any register editing access at all. Evaluate the form journey separately from the internal team’s ability to maintain one main record.

Inspect the existing data model

If Airtable already holds the main records, compare direct intake with a separate Tally-to-register handoff. Keep a customer and a new enquiry distinguishable rather than overwriting them into one ambiguous row. A separate form introduces a transfer boundary that needs its own failure inspection procedure.

Compare the actual response specification

Apply the same questions, files, branches and correction situations to both configurations. The operator must be able to use the received answer, not merely create a matching field. If respondents need later edits, inspect the actual correction and identity conditions separately.

Price both layers of the process

Check Tally’s paid entitlements and fair use alongside Airtable’s billable roles and capacity. A combined setup also needs any external integration bill. A free form does not make internal collaboration free, and a paid register does not automatically make every respondent a paid seat.

A hypothetical fifty-request pilot

For fifty requests from twenty existing customers, retain twenty customer entities and fifty request entities. Distinguish repeated delivery from another legitimate request by the same customer. Reconcile submitted, internally recorded and notified work rather than treating a sent alert as proof that every handoff completed.

Prepare to remove either layer

Retain question-to-field mapping, submission IDs and state meaning. Check continued handling of old requests independently from the future input route. Before cancelling either layer, validate necessary retained answers and establish a legitimate integration shutdown procedure.

Test a correction after intake

A fictional customer changes a deadline after submission. Distinguish the original answer, correction request and current register value. Decide whether an answer may be overwritten or an operator must review it. In a separate-form setup, do not assume later corrections automatically synchronize; inspect the required operation. Keep intake and internal review distinct and define what historical evidence is actually necessary.

Official sources

Pricing, availability and feature limits can change. Check the linked official pages before subscribing.

How we compareAdvertising disclosure