On smaller screens, scroll sideways to compare both tools.

Features and pricing of selected tools
Compare featuresSynthesiaHeyGen
Best forA script-and-avatar video platform for explanatory and training content, with Japanese voice generation.A cloud service for avatar video, translation, and voice generation, with Japanese in its supported voice languages.
CategoryAI voice & videoAI voice & video
Paid entry priceUS$19 / mo+Billed monthly · Starter

Regular monthly amount on the official page, excluding introductory offers. Creator was renamed Pro in October 2026; legacy information may differ.

US$29 / mo+Billed monthly · Creator

Regular monthly Creator price in USD, distinct from annual equivalents. Review allowances for the specific feature.

Free planSupportedSupported
Japanese supportSupportedSupported
DeploymentCloudCloud
Reasons to choose
  • A candidate for scripted presenter videos
  • Plans distinguish sharing and downloadable exports
  • Evaluate avatar production and multilingual video workflows
  • A free tier supports a short workflow evaluation
Before you subscribe
  • Basic and paid plans differ in watermark and export conditions
  • Shared credits support several features, so minutes alone are insufficient
  • Japanese support refers to voice generation
  • Free access limits video count and length
  • Avatar, translation, and API allowances are not interchangeable
  • Japanese voice support does not guarantee accuracy in every feature
Pricing checked2026-10-262026-10-26
Official pricingCheck pricingCheck pricing

Prices exclude tax, currency conversion and introductory discounts. Different currencies and billing periods are not directly comparable. Japanese support can apply to input, output or the interface; check each tool’s scope.

In this guide
  1. Fix one comparable assignment
  2. Compare presentation against the learner task
  3. Review localization and its correction scope
  4. Compare contracts meeting the same delivery requirement
  5. Exercise the handoff between roles
  6. Keep untested conditions in the conclusion
  7. Retain the basis for the decision

Fix one comparable assignment

Use a hypothetical three-minute procedure guide published in Japanese and English. Match the source script, supporting images, critical terms, destination and required resolution across both candidates. Do not compare a newly created avatar video in one service with translated recorded footage in the other and call that a universal product ranking. Choose the production method first: create both languages from scripts, or translate a completed original. Evaluate the work needed to finish that assignment. This guide does not report unperformed speed, lip-movement or educational-effectiveness benchmarks.

Compare presentation against the learner task

For a procedure guide, being able to identify the control may matter more than a large presenter image. Place the same supporting screen in each candidate and check conflicts among captions, presenter and target action. Compare using the presenter only for the introduction with using one throughout. The resulting design may change editing effort and usage assumptions. The shared ability to generate a presenter from text is only a starting point. An operational acceptance condition is that the regular editor can reproduce the explanation sequence required by the actual audience.

Review localization and its correction scope

Give Japanese and English reviewers a list of source quantities, conditions and qualifications. Check that shortened translations retain meaning and that captions agree with the supporting image. Language-list length alone cannot establish suitability for this assignment. Add one proper-name correction and document which parts of both versions need replacement. Keep scripts on matching revisions and record which output each approval covers. A process that lets the team identify those relationships reliably may be an operational advantage, even if another product offers a larger advertised set of voices or languages.

Compare contracts meeting the same delivery requirement

Read trials, downloads, branding, usage and collaboration as separate conditions. Map each service offer to the deliverable rather than assuming free exploration establishes production access. Separate ordinary monthly renewal, contract length and upfront annual expenditure. Do not place a monthly subscription next to an annual monthly equivalent without explaining the commitment. Establish API requirements separately from website subscriptions where automation is planned. Price becomes a useful comparison after both candidates can deliver approved output in the form the recipient needs. Otherwise the two offers solve different assignments.

Exercise the handoff between roles

Test whether someone other than the editor can communicate a precise pre-release correction. Separate people who only review, people who modify the script and people who obtain the final file. Alongside the contract permission table, verify that another authorized operator can locate sources and make a correction when the usual editor is absent. If distribution uses a learning platform, give the result to that operator and test playback. The comparison should cover the team route to publication rather than the comfort of one person inside the creation interface.

Keep untested conditions in the conclusion

Do not turn an unavailable trial capability into a demonstrated advantage. For permissions or outputs that could not be exercised, distinguish official documentation from an unanswered provider question. Limit the conclusion to the tested assignment and record what would need another pilot. If equal samples were impossible, disclose the different conditions. That lets a reader or internal buyer assess the evidence without relying on an apparently precise overall ranking.

Retain the basis for the decision

Record the assignment, contract and feature used, obtained output, correction work and unresolved conditions. For recurring training, choose against the complete revision and distribution workflow. For localization of recorded footage, compare that production route on its own consistent requirements. Keep a screen-recording and captioning alternative if neither candidate satisfies the task. A successful result under one language, operator and format does not establish the best choice for every future project. The decision record should let the next operator understand what was demonstrated and what still needs a separate pilot.

Official sources

Pricing, availability and feature limits can change. Check the linked official pages before subscribing.

How we compareAdvertising disclosure